Stephens Inc., In Re
on

By Jack D. Ballard

Trial court abused its discretion in ordering production of communications between client, investment banker, and their respective attorneys,

...Read More

Garces Restaurant Group, Inc., In Re
on

By David C. Franceski, Jr.

*Though a court cannot alter a professional fee arrangement, once approved under §328 of the Bankruptcy Code,

...Read More

Paul A. Corey & Assocs., Inc. v. Great-West Life & Annuity Ins. Co.
on

By Christopher G. Lazarini

The SEC’s pay-to-play rule makes it unlawful for any registered investment adviser and others identified in 17 C.F.R ,

...Read More

A Final Assessment of My 2018 Consumer and Employment Arbitration Predictions – Part II
on

By George H. Friedman*

SAC Contributing Legal Editor and Board of Editors Member

Toward the end of last year, I authored a blog post,

...Read More

Brummer v. Wey
on

By Jill I. Gross

Appellate Division vacates preliminary injunction issued by trial court against a website that published inflammatory and offensive content criticizing a member of FINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council who banned a broker from the industry.

...Read More

Klein v. QLIK Technologies, Inc.
on

By Jeremy Root

Absent evidence of bad faith, Rule 17(a) substitution of plaintiffs should be liberally allowed when the change is merely formal and in no way alters the original complaint’s factual allegations as to the events or the participants.

...Read More

Read Our Recent Blog